July 31, 2010 - Leave a Response

Why do democrats seem to believe that any money sent to Washingmachingtown, I mean Washington, magically leaves clean?

If they are spending our money there is some holy purpose; if we are spending our money it must be for dirtier purposes….

Three Risks

November 5, 2009 - Leave a Response

Could it be? Shannon says that the restitution of Zelaya is fully in the hands of the Honduran Congress. Zelaya is frantically reacting. Honduran Civic groups are standing up to internationalist bullies in Tegucigalpa. Has the US, finally, shown her ally the minimum support it needs to survive the Venezuelan assault on its institutions?

If so, bravo to Hillary. Once before, when she “kicked the can down the road” to the Arias mediation, we thought she had made a good move in creating space – space that was necessary to undo the damage from Obama’s catastrophic snap “coup” reaction. But then the US imposed additional sanctions on Honduras, presumably because of pressures from Caracas. Let’s hope that does not happen again.

The sun has broken through the clouds, and now the survival of strengthened Honduran democratic institutions suddenly is looking likely. There are three main risks remaining.

First, Chavistas may somehow pull a dirty trick with the Congress or Supreme Court. Recall that in Bolivia a key constitutional proposal was enacted when most of the opposition was unable to meet and vote. Similarly, just in the last month, Ortega finagled a supreme court decision in Nicaragua regarding his right to re-election. Again, this was accomplished with the tactic of arranging to have a vote while opposing justices were unavailable. Hondurans better post a whip at each door of the legislative meeting rooms.

Second, Chavez may somehow get inside Obama’s head again. At this point, Obama’s instincts for self-preservation must make him aware that his best exit is a successful election on November 29. Chavez may try to exploit the Obama/Hillary tension, or somehow demonize Shannon, who seems to be the grown-up in the room.

Third, the resort to more violence in the streets.

Minimal US support for elections makes all three tactics look like long-shots for Chavez now. So much grief could have been avoided if we had supported them earlier. Chavez will beat a tactical retreat and think about limiting strategic blowback against ALBA.

Smart Diplomacy: Killing Democratic Institutions

November 3, 2009 - 2 Responses

The latest US “smart” diplomacy celebrated in the press is in fact the cowardly abandonment of Honduran institutions to the tender mercies of her enemies. What would have been an electoral process to strengthen those institutions will now almost certainly weaken them. Consider,

In the absence of this deal, the local institutions were on track to execute a highly credible election, one in which Zelaya’s Liberal Party was heavily trailing the National Party yet was supportive of the process. Micheletti (a Liberal) had only ever stated that he is anxious to stand down as soon as possible, and Elvin Santos (the Liberal candidate) was also supportive of the election despite his weak polling. Power was already transferring to the TSE (electoral tribunal) from the executive, including with respect to the armed forces. These institutions had already stated unequivocally their rejection of Zelaya and his methods, as did popular polling by a large margin.

But with this deal, the US has exposed the individuals in the Congress and Supreme Court to the severest of carrots and sticks. There have been 3 questionable political murders and disappearences of Hondurans in the weeks prior to the deal. We can expect this fact to weigh heavily on the minds of the Honduran representatives. In addition, there have been reports of very large bribes (the major of Tegucigalpa says he has already been offered $15 million to support a “constituyente”) that one must presume come from Venezuelan drug and petro-dollars. By leaving the implication that the Hondurans should vote yes “or else”, the US is declaring open season. Venezuela may use all her carrots and sticks at will. On this playground the US does not have her little brother’s back.

So there are several ways this will go, all of which will weaken Honduran institutions. For starters, the deal is ambiguous in several respects. Without going into detail, it is enough to note that any practical result that is not clear cut will be bad for the credibility of the Honduran government and lead to more conflict, including more “need” for foreign intervention.

Second, a vote in favor of the deal will by necessity undermine the previous decision of the Supreme Court and torpedo the Constitution. It will eliminate the moral high ground enjoyed by Hondurans in defending their sovereignty, and demoralize the public. The assault on Honduran institutions will redouble, not end.

Third, a vote in favor of the deal will by necessity undermine the previous action by the Congress and open the institution and its individuals to prosecution. The truth commission, weighted towards leftists and internationalists, is already in place. Allowing this weighting was an error by Michelletti in an otherwise heroic effort.

Fourth, if Lobo allows his Nationalist delegates to vote for Zelaya’s reinstatement, he will lose a great deal of support. The election will already become a much closer call. If the election is close this will be a very dangerous moment. An unambigous result will open the door for allegations of fraud and in any case will confuse any message that the electorate is trying to send. Zelayista’s will be able to claim moral victory out of any mess.

Fifth, if the Supreme Court recommends No but the Congress votes Yes, both institutions are undermined. A constitutional convention will be called for.

Sixth, if both Supreme Court and Congress vote No, more unsolved murders will occur. The international community will withhold recognition. The US will look bad and presumably will follow through on whatever actions it used to scare the Michelletti team.

In a previous post, we said that the fix was in, and that we expected a deal to reinstate Zelaya with “limited” powers. This limitation would then be challenged continuously and Honduran institutions remain on trial until they were destroyed. No recent developments have changed this view.